Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Requires data centers to disclose tax benefits and accountability information to Congress.
The problem
Data centers receive significant tax incentives, but Congress lacks transparency about these costs and benefits to taxpayers and communities.
The proposal
The bill mandates data centers report their tax breaks, economic contributions, and public impacts to enable congressional oversight.
The impact
Data centers, tech companies, state/local governments, and taxpayers are affected through disclosure requirements and potential policy changes.
Lawmakers gain detailed information about tax incentives given to data centers. This helps Congress understand costs and benefits of these programs. Better information leads to smarter policy decisions.
Citizens can see how much tax money goes to data centers. This allows public debate about whether incentives are worthwhile. Accountability to taxpayers improves.
Local governments get better data on data center impacts. This helps communities make informed decisions about allowing new facilities. Public participation in policy becomes easier.
Disclosure reveals which companies receive more incentives. This creates a level playing field by exposing hidden advantages. Market transparency improves.
Data centers must gather and submit detailed information to Congress. This requires time, staff, and money to comply. Small operators face higher proportional costs than large companies.
Disclosures may reveal business strategies and financial details to competitors. Companies worry proprietary information becomes public. This could harm their competitive advantages.
Public disclosure might discourage data center investment in some areas. Companies may choose locations with fewer reporting requirements. States and local communities could lose jobs and economic growth.
The bill provides no summary of specific reporting requirements or timelines. Companies lack clear guidance on compliance. Implementation could be confusing and costly.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10730
Healthy Communities Act of 2026
HR 5349
TAS Act
HR 9496
End Tax Penalties on American Hostages Act
HR 997
National Taxpayer Advocate Enhancement Act of 2025
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
No donor data found for current cycle
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.