Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Requires government agencies to collaborate on identifying and responding to adversarial security threats.
The problem
Government agencies may not effectively coordinate when responding to security threats from foreign adversaries or hostile actors.
The proposal
Establishes collaboration frameworks requiring federal agencies to share information and coordinate security responses against adversarial threats and risks.
The impact
Federal agencies, national security officials, and potentially private sector partners must participate in new information-sharing and coordination procedures.
When agencies share information, they can spot security threats faster. Multiple agencies seeing the same data helps catch problems earlier.
Agencies won't waste resources investigating the same threats separately. Coordination prevents overlap and saves taxpayer money.
A unified response to adversarial threats protects the country better. Coordinated action is more effective than agencies working alone.
Clear collaboration rules mean agencies respond quickly to threats. Speed matters when national security is at stake.
Increased information sharing between agencies could expose personal data. Americans might worry about government surveillance expanding.
Adding collaboration requirements creates new bureaucratic processes. This could slow down agencies or require significant new spending.
The bill doesn't specify which agency leads or how conflicts are resolved. Disagreements between agencies could create confusion.
Vague definitions of 'adversarial threats' could be interpreted too broadly. Agencies might apply collaboration rules in situations that weren't intended.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10764
Executive Settlement Review Act
HR 8352
Criminal History Access Act of 2026
S 32
LACA
HR 10389
Survivor’s Voice Protection Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
No donor data found for current cycle
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.