Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Requires new federally-funded single-family homes to be accessible for people with disabilities.
The problem
Many new homes are not designed to accommodate people with disabilities, limiting their housing options and independence.
The proposal
New single-family houses and townhouses built with federal assistance must meet visitability standards for disabled residents.
The impact
Homebuilders, federal housing programs, people with disabilities, and future homebuyers are affected by new construction requirements.
People with disabilities gain more housing options that meet their needs. This increases independence and dignity for a vulnerable population.
Visitability features help elderly people, parents with strollers, and people recovering from injuries. Standards benefit more than just disabled residents.
Accessible homes appeal to more buyers over time. This can maintain or increase property value and resale potential.
Building accessibility into new homes costs less than retrofitting existing homes. This saves money and disruption later.
Adding visitability features increases building expenses. This could make federally-assisted homes more expensive or reduce how many homes get built.
Builders must follow new standards and may need retraining. Compliance costs could discourage smaller builders from participating in federal programs.
Only federally-assisted homes are affected, not all new construction. This creates an uneven market where some builders follow different rules.
Visitability standards focus on mobility accessibility but may not help people with sensory or cognitive disabilities. Standards cannot solve all accessibility needs.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
S 5652
Build American Efficiency Act
HR 4646
Whistleblower Protection Act of 2025
HR 1640
HEIRS Act of 2025
HR 10168
Veterans Housing Opportunity Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.