Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill aims to strengthen protections against economic espionage by the People's Republic of China.
The problem
The U.S. faces concerns about Chinese economic espionage, theft of trade secrets, and unauthorized technology transfer that harm American businesses and national security interests.
The proposal
The bill would establish new measures to detect, prevent, and prosecute economic espionage activities targeting U.S. companies and technology by foreign adversaries, particularly China.
The impact
American businesses, tech companies, government agencies, and researchers would face new compliance requirements while gaining protection against foreign espionage and intellectual property theft.
Strengthening defenses against espionage helps U.S. companies keep their inventions and trade secrets safe. This protects investments in research and development that American businesses spend billions on yearly.
Preventing theft of sensitive technology and research protects America's military and technological advantages. This helps ensure U.S. security capabilities remain stronger than potential adversaries.
Strong enforcement against espionage makes competition fairer for American companies. They won't have to compete against foreign companies using stolen American secrets and technology.
When American companies keep their technology and profits, they're more likely to invest and hire domestically. This helps protect American jobs in tech and manufacturing sectors.
Companies might need to spend money on new security systems and compliance procedures to meet the bill's requirements. These costs could be passed to consumers through higher prices.
New enforcement measures might require monitoring of employees, communications, or data that could affect worker privacy. The balance between security and privacy rights may be unclear.
Aggressive enforcement or accusations of espionage might create tension with China and other trading partners. This could lead to retaliatory measures or trade disputes.
Proving economic espionage is difficult and requires significant investigative resources. The bill may be hard to enforce effectively without clear definitions and international cooperation.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10748
Balkans Security Cooperation Act
SRES 939
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate that it values the active participation of the Republic of Kosovo as the state partner of the Iowa National Guard over the past 15 years.
HR 1744
United States Commission on International Religious Freedom Reauthorization Act of 2026
HCONRES 89
Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.