Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Creates tax relief for fertility treatment and adoption costs.
The problem
Fertility treatments and adoption are expensive. Many families struggle to afford these services. Current tax benefits don't fully cover these costs.
The proposal
Bill provides tax credits or deductions for fertility procedures, medications, and adoption expenses. Specific mechanisms not yet detailed in available text.
The impact
Families pursuing fertility treatment or adoption would receive financial assistance. Impact on federal budget and tax revenue depends on final provisions.
Reduces financial barriers for people struggling with infertility. Makes fertility treatments more accessible to middle and lower-income families. Could increase treatment rates among those priced out of care.
Adoption tax relief could encourage more people to adopt. Reduces upfront costs that deter prospective adoptive parents. Addresses barriers to family formation.
Increased spending by families on fertility services stimulates medical industry. Creates demand for clinics, pharmaceuticals, and related services. Could support healthcare sector jobs.
Helps level the playing field for wealthier versus less wealthy families. Recognizes infertility as a real barrier to family formation. Provides targeted assistance to specific population.
Tax credits or deductions reduce government revenue. Could increase federal budget deficit unless offset elsewhere. May require spending cuts in other areas.
Tax credits mainly help those earning enough to owe taxes. Lower-income families may see limited benefits if refundable provisions are absent. Could increase inequality rather than reduce it.
Subsidizing fertility treatment doesn't guarantee success. May encourage spending on expensive procedures with uncertain results. Could lead to wasteful use of resources.
Bill specifics are unavailable, making full impact assessment difficult. Unclear which procedures qualify or what income limits apply. Could have unintended consequences based on final rules.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10730
Healthy Communities Act of 2026
HR 5349
TAS Act
HR 9496
End Tax Penalties on American Hostages Act
HR 997
National Taxpayer Advocate Enhancement Act of 2025
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.