Latest action: Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 666.
Committee has approved the bill (usually with amendments) and sent it back to the full chamber.
The committee voted to send the bill to the floor of the full chamber. The Speaker of the House schedules a floor vote.
Next: Passed One Chamber
The other chamber (Senate or House) repeats the committee + floor-vote process
Requires transparency about foreign funding sources in the United States.
The problem
Foreign entities may fund American organizations without public knowledge, raising concerns about influence and accountability in political and civic processes.
The proposal
The bill mandates disclosure of foreign financial sources to relevant U.S. government agencies and establishes reporting requirements for organizations receiving foreign funds.
The impact
Organizations receiving foreign money, nonprofits, educational institutions, and foreign entities would face new reporting obligations and potential scrutiny of their funding sources.
Americans would know which foreign countries and entities are funding domestic organizations. This transparency helps citizens understand potential outside influence on policy and public opinion.
Tracking foreign funding helps identify potential threats to national interests. It prevents adversaries from secretly funding organizations that could harm American security.
Voters could see who is funding political campaigns and advocacy groups. This helps people make informed decisions about whose messages to trust.
Clear rules make it harder for bad actors to hide money laundering or illegal foreign interference. The law creates clear standards everyone must follow.
Organizations would spend money and staff time on reporting instead of their missions. Small groups with limited budgets could struggle with compliance costs.
Universities and organizations might avoid beneficial international collaborations due to reporting fears. Foreign scholars and researchers could hesitate to work with American institutions.
Detailed disclosures of foreign funding could expose private donors or organizations to unwanted scrutiny or retaliation. Legitimate international relationships might become public.
The bill's lack of detail leaves questions about what counts as 'foreign funding' and which organizations must report. This confusion could lead to inconsistent enforcement.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10730
Healthy Communities Act of 2026
HR 5349
TAS Act
HR 9496
End Tax Penalties on American Hostages Act
HR 997
National Taxpayer Advocate Enhancement Act of 2025
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
No donor data found for current cycle
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.