Latest action: Referred to the Subcommittee on General Farm Commodities, Risk Management, and Credit.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill to revitalize the Rural Telephone Cooperative Program through agricultural policy.
The problem
Rural telephone cooperatives face financial and operational challenges providing communication services to remote agricultural communities with limited resources.
The proposal
Updates and strengthens support mechanisms for rural telephone cooperative programs under agricultural credit and commodity risk management frameworks.
The impact
Rural farmers, agricultural communities, and small telephone cooperatives in remote areas gain improved communication infrastructure and potential financial assistance.
Strengthening rural telephone cooperatives helps farmers access better communication services. This supports agricultural business operations and emergency services in remote areas. Better connectivity improves quality of life for rural residents.
The program provides financial backing to struggling rural telephone cooperatives. This helps these organizations remain operational and competitive. Support enables investment in modern technology and infrastructure.
Reliable communication is essential for farming operations and agribusiness. Improved connectivity supports market access, weather information, and supply chain coordination. Rural farmers gain competitive advantages with better communication tools.
The bill reinforces member-owned cooperative structures in rural areas. Cooperatives typically reinvest profits locally and serve underserved populations. Strengthening them supports community-based economic development.
Without an official summary, the specific revitalization mechanisms and funding amounts are unknown. This makes cost-benefit analysis difficult. Effectiveness cannot be properly evaluated without clearer details.
Agricultural programs typically require federal funding or subsidies. Revitalization efforts may increase government spending on rural telecommunications. Costs and long-term financial sustainability are unclear.
Cooperative support programs may reduce incentives for private companies to serve rural markets. Government intervention could hinder market-driven telecommunications innovation. Competition might decrease in some rural areas.
Details about which cooperatives qualify and how benefits are distributed remain unknown. Without clear criteria, funds might not reach the most vulnerable rural areas. Implementation fairness cannot be assessed.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10157
Freedom to Home Distill Act
S 5301
Voice for Farm Workers Act
S 5303
Supporting Our Farm and Food System Workforce Act
HR 10058
Summer Meals and Learning Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.