Latest action: Referred to the Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and Intelligence.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Improves accuracy and transparency of the government's terrorist watchlist database.
The problem
The terrorist watchlist may contain errors, outdated information, or people wrongly listed, affecting innocent people's rights and travel.
The proposal
Requires regular audits of watchlist data, removes outdated entries, improves accuracy checks, and increases transparency about how people are added or removed.
The impact
Watchlist individuals gain clearer processes to challenge listings. Government agencies must follow stricter procedures. Innocent people wrongly listed may be removed faster.
Reduces errors that prevent innocent people from flying or traveling. Gives wrongly listed people better ways to clear their names quickly. Improves fairness in the system.
Makes agencies explain and justify watchlist decisions. Requires regular checks for accuracy and outdated information. Improves public trust through transparency.
Removes people no longer considered threats. Removes false or outdated information from records. Helps agencies focus on real security threats.
Cleaner data helps agencies identify actual threats better. Reduces time wasted on false leads. Makes watchlist more effective for real counterterrorism.
Requiring more audits and checks could delay adding genuine threats to watchlists. Extra procedures might slow emergency responses. Could create bureaucratic delays.
Regular audits and new procedures require funding and staff. Government agencies must hire people to check data. Costs may be significant.
More transparency could reveal how watchlist works to bad actors. Detailed disclosure might compromise security methods. Could help terrorists avoid detection.
Bill details about penalties for violations are not yet known. Unclear how agencies will be forced to follow new rules. May lack teeth to ensure compliance.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 7683
VA Fiscal Management Modernization Act
HR 6698
Board of Veterans Appeals Annual Report Transparency Act of 2025
HR 7260
National Cemetery Administration Annual Report Act of 2026
HR 2283
Recognizing Community Organizations for Veteran Engagement and Recovery Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.