Latest action: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Requires fair treatment rules when healthy banks buy failing banks.
The problem
When banks fail, the government arranges quick sales to healthy banks. Rules may favor large buyers or create unfair advantages.
The proposal
Establishes fairness standards and oversight procedures for acquisitions of failing banks to ensure competitive bidding and equal treatment.
The impact
Banks, regulators, and depositors affected by how failing bank sales happen and who gets to buy them.
Fair bidding rules could let smaller banks compete to buy failing banks. This prevents large banks from getting unfair advantages.
Smaller regional banks could have better chances to expand by buying failed institutions. This keeps banking competitive.
Establishes transparent standards for how bank sales happen. Removes confusion about the government's process for handling failures.
Fairness requirements and extra steps could slow down emergency bank sales. Speed matters when banks fail to protect customers.
Competitive bidding processes cost money and take time. These expenses could increase costs for banks and regulators.
Stricter rules might discourage healthy banks from rescuing failing ones. Buyers need confidence the deal won't become complicated.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
S 5639
Portal for Appraisal Licensing Act of 2026
S 1564
Floodplain Enhancement and Recovery Act
HR 1190
Expanding Access to Capital for Rural Job Creators Act
HR 7730
Bankruptcy Threshold Adjustment Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
No donor data found for current cycle
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.