Latest action: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Requires the government to assess terror threats from major U.S. allied nations.
The problem
The U.S. government may not fully evaluate terrorism risks originating from countries classified as Major Non-NATO Allies, potentially creating security gaps in threat assessment.
The proposal
The bill mandates regular assessments and reporting on terrorism threats from Major Non-NATO Allied countries to Congress and relevant federal agencies.
The impact
Government agencies, Congress, and foreign policy officials gain better information about terror threats from allied nations to inform security decisions.
Regular threat assessments help identify emerging terrorism risks early, allowing the government to take preventive action. This improves national security by ensuring no threats are overlooked based on alliance status.
Congress receives detailed information about terror threats from allied countries, enabling lawmakers to make better decisions about military aid, intelligence sharing, and diplomatic relationships.
The bill establishes uniform procedures for assessing terror threats regardless of a nation's alliance status, reducing favoritism and ensuring objective analysis.
Mandatory reporting requirements create oversight mechanisms that ensure the government is regularly examining threats and reporting findings to elected representatives.
Publicly reporting terror threat assessments of allied nations could damage international relationships and offend partner countries, potentially weakening important military and intelligence alliances.
Government agencies must dedicate resources to conduct new assessments and prepare reports, increasing operational costs and diverting attention from other security priorities.
Assessments of established allies may reveal few actual threats, making the requirement wasteful if the allied nations are genuinely low-risk to U.S. security.
Sharing detailed terror threat assessments with Congress requires careful handling of classified intelligence, which could complicate the reporting process and limit transparency.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10748
Balkans Security Cooperation Act
SRES 939
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate that it values the active participation of the Republic of Kosovo as the state partner of the Iowa National Guard over the past 15 years.
HR 1744
United States Commission on International Religious Freedom Reauthorization Act of 2026
HCONRES 89
Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.