Latest action: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill to increase accountability and oversight of monitoring activities by federal agencies.
The problem
Federal agencies conduct various monitoring activities with limited transparency or public oversight, raising concerns about accountability and potential overreach in surveillance practices.
The proposal
Establishes requirements for federal agencies to report monitoring activities, creates oversight mechanisms, and sets standards for monitoring program transparency and accountability.
The impact
Federal agencies, Congress, and the public would be affected through new reporting requirements, oversight procedures, and increased transparency in government monitoring practices.
The bill would require federal agencies to disclose monitoring activities to Congress and the public. This makes government operations more visible and allows citizens to understand how they are being monitored. Greater transparency can build public trust in government institutions.
Congress would gain new tools to review and oversee federal monitoring programs. This checks executive branch power and ensures elected representatives can hold agencies accountable. Better oversight protects against potential government overreach.
The bill would establish consistent rules across agencies for monitoring activities. Uniform standards prevent inconsistent practices and ensure fair treatment. Clear guidelines help agencies understand their obligations and reduce confusion.
Requiring disclosure of monitoring activities could reveal sensitive security methods to adversaries. Public reports about federal surveillance programs might compromise law enforcement effectiveness. Agencies might need to redact information to protect national security.
Agencies would face new reporting and compliance requirements that cost money and staff time. Small agency offices might struggle with additional bureaucratic demands. These costs could reduce resources available for actual monitoring and enforcement work.
The bill lacks an official summary, making it difficult to assess specific requirements and procedures. Agencies may have different interpretations of vague rules. Courts could face challenges resolving disputes about compliance requirements.
New approval and reporting processes could slow down agency monitoring activities. Time spent on compliance paperwork diverts focus from actual work. Bureaucratic delays might hinder rapid response to emerging threats.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10764
Executive Settlement Review Act
HR 8352
Criminal History Access Act of 2026
S 32
LACA
HR 10389
Survivor’s Voice Protection Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.