Latest action: Referred to the Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and Intelligence.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Creates oversight office and ombudsman role for DHS intelligence activities.
The problem
DHS intelligence operations lack transparent accountability mechanisms and formal channels for addressing public concerns about intelligence activities.
The proposal
Establishes a dedicated DHS Intelligence Transparency and Oversight Program Office and ombudsman position to review intelligence practices and handle complaints.
The impact
DHS intelligence personnel, oversight committees, and public members with intelligence-related complaints gain new review processes and accountability channels.
Creates formal oversight of DHS intelligence activities, making operations more transparent and accountable. An ombudsman provides an independent channel for investigating complaints and concerns.
Dedicated transparency office demonstrates commitment to addressing public concerns about intelligence practices. Independent review can help rebuild confidence in DHS operations.
Regular oversight and complaint reviews can identify problems and recommend improvements to DHS intelligence procedures. Helps agencies learn from mistakes and adjust practices.
Provides individuals with a formal way to report concerns about DHS intelligence activities. Creates documented record of issues and agency responses.
Intelligence oversight involving sensitive classified materials creates security challenges. Must balance transparency with protection of national security secrets and methods.
Ombudsman offices typically lack enforcement power and rely on recommendations. May struggle to drive meaningful changes if agencies resist suggested improvements.
Adding oversight requirements and approval processes could slow DHS intelligence operations. Reviews and investigations take time that might delay urgent security responses.
Establishing a new office and hiring ombudsman staff requires government funding. Creates ongoing budget expenses for DHS operations.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 7683
VA Fiscal Management Modernization Act
HR 6698
Board of Veterans Appeals Annual Report Transparency Act of 2025
HR 7260
National Cemetery Administration Annual Report Act of 2026
HR 2283
Recognizing Community Organizations for Veteran Engagement and Recovery Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.