Latest action: Referred to the Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill aims to protect homeowners from squatters occupying their properties.
The problem
Some people occupy homes they don't own or rent, creating legal disputes and hardship for property owners trying to remove them.
The proposal
Establishes federal protections and procedures to help homeowners remove squatters faster and more effectively from their properties.
The impact
Homeowners gain clearer legal tools to regain control of properties; squatters face stricter eviction rules; courts handle more housing cases.
Streamlined legal processes allow homeowners to regain control of their properties more quickly. This reduces the time properties sit occupied without owner permission.
Homeowners gain clearer legal standing and federal support in eviction cases. This strengthens protections for people invested in real estate.
Stronger rules against squatting may discourage unauthorized occupation of vacant homes. This helps keep housing stock available for legitimate renters and buyers.
Federal rules create uniform procedures across states instead of varying local laws. This provides consistency and predictability for property owners nationwide.
Stricter eviction rules may displace vulnerable people lacking stable housing. Homeless individuals and those in precarious situations could face faster removal.
Faster eviction procedures might limit time for legal defense and evidence gathering. People accused of squatting may have reduced opportunity to prove legitimate claims.
Increased eviction cases could overwhelm housing courts and judicial resources. This diverts court attention and funding from other legal matters.
Simplified procedures might not account for complicated situations like tenant rights disputes or unclear lease agreements. Some legitimate occupants could lose protections.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
S 5652
Build American Efficiency Act
HR 4646
Whistleblower Protection Act of 2025
HR 1640
HEIRS Act of 2025
HR 10168
Veterans Housing Opportunity Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.