Latest action: Referred to the Subcommittee on Nutrition and Foreign Agriculture.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill to increase the supply and availability of organic produce in the United States.
The problem
Americans want more organic food options, but organic farming is limited and expensive. Supply cannot meet growing demand.
The proposal
Bill would likely provide support for organic farming through incentives, grants, or programs to help farmers grow more organic produce.
The impact
Organic farmers could receive financial help. Consumers might see more organic food options. Food prices and farming practices could change.
Increasing organic produce supply gives consumers more healthy food options. People who want organic food would find it easier to buy. Local farmers could benefit from new markets.
Organic farming uses fewer synthetic chemicals and pesticides. This protects soil and water quality. Supporting organic farming helps the environment.
Organic farmers often earn more per crop but face higher costs. Government support could help small farms survive and grow. Rural communities could strengthen.
More access to organic produce may improve public health. Organic foods avoid synthetic pesticides. Communities could see better nutrition outcomes.
Programs to support organic farming cost taxpayer money. The full cost is unknown without seeing the bill details. Funds could be used elsewhere.
Organic farming is more expensive than conventional farming. Even with help, organic produce may stay more costly. Lower-income families might not afford it.
Supporting only organic farming might disadvantage conventional farmers. This could create unfair competition. Traditional agriculture may lose market share.
Without the full bill text, specifics are unclear. The actual impact depends on program details. Unintended consequences are possible.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10157
Freedom to Home Distill Act
S 5301
Voice for Farm Workers Act
S 5303
Supporting Our Farm and Food System Workforce Act
HR 10058
Summer Meals and Learning Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.