Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Allows workers to exclude bicycle commuting benefits from taxable income.
The problem
Employees who bike to work may face tax penalties compared to those receiving transit benefits. Current law doesn't equally support environmentally friendly commuting options.
The proposal
Creates tax exclusion allowing employers to provide untaxed bicycle commuting benefits to employees, similar to transit pass benefits.
The impact
Employees who bike to work, employers offering benefits, and government tax revenue are affected. Could encourage biking and reduce commuting costs.
Makes biking more affordable by reducing out-of-pocket costs through tax savings. Encourages healthier commuting choices and reduces traffic congestion.
Puts bicycle commuters on equal footing with transit pass users who already receive tax-free benefits. Levels the playing field for different commuting methods.
Regular biking improves employee fitness and reduces healthcare costs. May decrease absenteeism and boost workplace productivity.
Reduces carbon emissions by incentivizing bike commuting over cars. Supports climate and air quality goals.
Government loses tax income from excluded bicycle benefits. Revenue loss could require budget cuts elsewhere or tax increases.
Primarily benefits higher-income workers and those in bikeable areas. Low-income and rural workers cannot use this benefit.
Biking is impractical in harsh weather and dangerous areas. Benefit may not work for most American workers year-round.
Employers and the IRS face new costs tracking and verifying bicycle commuting benefits. Compliance could be complex and burdensome.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10730
Healthy Communities Act of 2026
HR 5349
TAS Act
HR 9496
End Tax Penalties on American Hostages Act
HR 997
National Taxpayer Advocate Enhancement Act of 2025
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
No donor data found for current cycle
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.