Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Creates educational exchange programs between American community colleges and international institutions.
The problem
Limited international education opportunities for community college students. Reduced cross-cultural understanding and global workforce competitiveness among some American workers.
The proposal
Establishes framework for community colleges to partner with foreign educational institutions for student and faculty exchanges, collaborative learning programs, and cultural engagement initiatives.
The impact
Community college students, faculty, international partners, and participating educational institutions gain expanded learning opportunities and cultural connections.
Community college students gain access to international education experiences traditionally available mainly at four-year universities. This broadens their career prospects and global awareness. Many students may not otherwise afford or access such opportunities.
Exchange programs build relationships between American and foreign institutions, fostering cultural understanding and potentially benefiting future diplomacy. These connections create networks that can support long-term international cooperation.
Students gain international skills and perspectives valued by employers in an increasingly global economy. Exchange participants may develop language abilities and cross-cultural competencies useful in many career fields.
Educational exchanges promote positive American influence abroad and improve international perceptions. Young people who study together often become advocates for mutual understanding.
The bill provides no official summary, making specifics unclear. Without details about funding, eligibility requirements, or partner country vetting, implementation challenges may arise and costs could be unpredictable.
Exchange programs require funding for travel, administration, and coordination. Costs to taxpayers or participating institutions are unknown without seeing the actual bill language.
International exchanges require careful screening of participants and partner institutions. Unclear security protocols could create vulnerabilities or expose students to risks.
Exchange opportunities may benefit some community college students more than others based on language ability, academic standing, or financial resources. Gaps in access could worsen existing educational inequalities.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10748
Balkans Security Cooperation Act
SRES 939
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate that it values the active participation of the Republic of Kosovo as the state partner of the Iowa National Guard over the past 15 years.
HR 1744
United States Commission on International Religious Freedom Reauthorization Act of 2026
HCONRES 89
Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.