Latest action: Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by the Yeas and Nays: 40 - 0.
Committee has approved the bill (usually with amendments) and sent it back to the full chamber.
The committee voted to send the bill to the floor of the full chamber. The Speaker of the House schedules a floor vote.
Next: Passed One Chamber
The other chamber (Senate or House) repeats the committee + floor-vote process
Requires AI companies to report taxes accurately and prevents tax avoidance schemes.
The problem
AI companies may use complex structures to avoid paying fair taxes. This reduces government revenue and creates unfair competition with traditional businesses.
The proposal
The bill establishes tax reporting requirements and oversight rules specifically for artificial intelligence businesses and related transactions.
The impact
AI companies must follow stricter tax rules. Shareholders and government revenues are affected. Technology sector compliance costs may increase.
Ensures AI companies pay taxes like other businesses. Reduces unfair advantages that come from complex tax strategies. Levels the playing field for all companies.
Increased tax collection can fund public services. Money could support schools, infrastructure, or reduce deficits. Strengthens public finances.
Companies know exactly what's expected. Reduces confusion about AI tax obligations. Makes enforcement more straightforward.
Stops aggressive tax avoidance schemes. Protects tax system integrity. Prevents wealthy corporations from dodging responsibilities.
AI companies must invest in reporting systems and staff. Smaller AI firms may struggle more than large ones. Compliance expenses could be significant.
Higher costs and stricter rules might discourage startups. Companies could reduce research spending. May affect America's competitiveness in AI.
The bill lacks details on what counts as an AI company. Ambiguity could create disputes about who must comply. Different interpretations might cause problems.
Other countries may not have similar rules. US companies face disadvantages against foreign competitors. Could affect global market position.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10730
Healthy Communities Act of 2026
HR 5349
TAS Act
HR 9496
End Tax Penalties on American Hostages Act
HR 997
National Taxpayer Advocate Enhancement Act of 2025
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.