Latest action: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Originating chamber has voted to pass. Sent to the other chamber.
The House voted to pass the bill. It now moves to the Senate, which repeats the committee referral and floor-vote process.
Next: Passed Both Chambers
Conference committee (if versions differ), then the President
Provides tax relief and assistance to people who are victims of fraud.
The problem
Fraud victims often suffer financial losses and may face tax complications when recovering stolen funds or receiving restitution payments.
The proposal
The bill creates tax relief provisions for individuals who have been defrauded, allowing them to exclude certain recovered amounts from taxable income.
The impact
Fraud victims receive financial help through tax breaks. Taxpayers may see minor revenue changes. Government agencies handle more fraud-related tax cases.
Fraud victims often lose money and struggle financially. This bill reduces their tax burden during recovery, helping them rebuild their lives without extra tax penalties.
It is unfair to tax money that was stolen from someone and then recovered. This bill treats fraud victims more fairly by not taxing their recovered funds.
When victims know they will not face extra taxes on recovered money, they are more likely to report fraud. This helps law enforcement catch criminals.
Fraud victims often have limited income while dealing with loss. Tax relief prevents additional financial strain during an already difficult time.
Tax relief for fraud victims means the government collects less tax money. This could reduce funding for schools, roads, and other public services.
The IRS must verify that someone was actually a fraud victim. This requires extra work and resources, and some legitimate claims might be wrongly denied.
Some people might falsely claim to be fraud victims to get tax breaks. Without strict rules, dishonest people could take advantage of this benefit.
Without details about what types of fraud qualify or how much relief applies, the bill may be hard to implement fairly and consistently.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10730
Healthy Communities Act of 2026
HR 5349
TAS Act
HR 9496
End Tax Penalties on American Hostages Act
HR 997
National Taxpayer Advocate Enhancement Act of 2025
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
No donor data found for current cycle
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.