Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill removes certain requirements from the federal summer food program for children.
The problem
The summer food service program has requirements that may burden schools and organizations. The bill aims to reduce administrative demands on program participants.
The proposal
The bill amends the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act to eliminate specific requirements under the summer food service program for children.
The impact
Schools, food service organizations, and low-income children who depend on summer meal programs may be affected by changes to how the program operates.
Removing requirements could make it easier for schools and organizations to run the summer food program. This may allow more resources to go toward actually serving meals rather than paperwork.
Fewer requirements could speed up how quickly meals reach children during summer months. Organizations might be able to serve more students with less delay.
Eliminating certain requirements might reduce costs for schools and organizations running the program. This could stretch limited budgets further.
Removing requirements could reduce food safety checks and nutritional standards. Children might receive meals that don't meet quality or health standards.
Requirements often ensure equitable access to all eligible children. Removing them could exclude vulnerable students from receiving meals.
Fewer rules make it harder to track whether programs work well or spend money properly. Public accountability and transparency could suffer.
Different areas might provide very different levels of service without consistent requirements. Some children could receive much better meals than others.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10157
Freedom to Home Distill Act
S 5301
Voice for Farm Workers Act
S 5303
Supporting Our Farm and Food System Workforce Act
HR 10058
Summer Meals and Learning Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.