Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Agriculture.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Clarifies which land can be enrolled in a federal conservation program.
The problem
Uncertainty exists about which types of land qualify for the Conservation Reserve Program, potentially limiting participation and conservation effectiveness.
The proposal
Amends the Food Security Act of 1985 to provide clearer definitions and eligibility requirements for land enrollment in the conservation reserve program.
The impact
Farmers and landowners gain clarity on program eligibility. Conservation organizations benefit from streamlined enrollment. Taxpayers' investment in conservation is protected through better-defined rules.
Farmers will know exactly which lands qualify for the program without confusion. This makes it easier to plan conservation efforts and apply for benefits.
Clear eligibility standards reduce disputes and processing delays. Government agencies can manage the program faster and with fewer errors.
Clear guidelines ensure the right lands are protected for conservation. This strengthens the program's ability to improve soil health and wildlife habitat.
Tighter eligibility definitions might exclude some landowners who previously participated. Farmers on borderline lands could lose program access and income.
Changing program rules requires retraining staff and notifying current participants. Transition periods could create confusion during the changeover.
Without the full bill text, we cannot assess specific changes or their exact effects. The actual impact depends on which lands are added or removed.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10157
Freedom to Home Distill Act
S 5301
Voice for Farm Workers Act
S 5303
Supporting Our Farm and Food System Workforce Act
HR 10058
Summer Meals and Learning Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.