Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Requires government agencies to hold open meetings and make records public.
The problem
Government agencies sometimes conduct business in secret. Citizens cannot always access public records or attend meetings. This reduces transparency and public participation in government decisions.
The proposal
The bill requires federal agencies to open most meetings to the public and provide easy access to government records. It sets standards for notification and record-keeping.
The impact
Federal agencies, Congress, and citizens are affected. Agencies must follow new transparency rules. Citizens gain better access to government information and meetings.
Citizens can attend meetings and see how government makes decisions. People know what their government is doing. This builds public trust.
People can attend meetings and speak about issues. Communities can provide input on decisions that affect them. Democracy works better when people participate.
Citizens can get government documents without long delays. Information is easier to find and obtain. This helps journalists, researchers, and everyday people.
Secret meetings create opportunities for wrongdoing. Open meetings make officials more accountable. Sunlight is a powerful anti-corruption tool.
Agencies must spend money on recording, organizing, and sharing records. Staff time increases for managing public meetings and document requests. Budgets may need to grow.
Some information involves national security or personal privacy. Making everything public could expose classified material or private citizens' data. Balancing openness and safety is difficult.
Open meetings and record requirements take extra time. Agencies may move slower on important issues. Efficiency could decrease.
Officials might hesitate to speak freely in public meetings. Some agencies need private space to explore ideas candidly. Open meetings could reduce honest debate.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10764
Executive Settlement Review Act
HR 8352
Criminal History Access Act of 2026
S 32
LACA
HR 10389
Survivor’s Voice Protection Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.