Latest action: Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Establishes defense cooperation between the United States and Abraham Accords signatories.
The problem
The Abraham Accords normalized relations between Israel and several Arab nations. The U.S. seeks to strengthen military and security partnerships with these countries.
The proposal
Creates frameworks for defense cooperation, military coordination, and security agreements between the U.S. and Abraham Accords signatory nations including UAE and Bahrain.
The impact
Affects military personnel, defense contractors, Middle Eastern allies, and U.S. foreign policy. Increases security cooperation and defense partnerships in the region.
Formalizes defense partnerships that can help counter threats in the Middle East. Creates security frameworks that discourage aggression and promote peaceful cooperation among regional partners.
Reinforces the Abraham Accords by backing them with military and security commitments. Demonstrates U.S. support for the normalization of relations between Israel and Arab nations.
May increase defense contracts and military equipment sales to partner nations. Creates business opportunities for American defense contractors and manufacturers.
Strengthens American military presence and influence in a strategically important region. Improves coordination on counterterrorism and regional security challenges.
Could anger other regional actors like Iran who view these partnerships as threatening. May be seen as taking sides in regional conflicts, reducing U.S. impartiality.
Commits additional U.S. defense resources and funding to new partnerships. Requires ongoing military support and security guarantees that cost American taxpayers.
Coordinating defense systems and operations across multiple countries is difficult. Requires sharing sensitive military information and coordinating complex logistics.
Without an official summary, the specific commitments and requirements are unclear. May commit the U.S. to undefined military obligations or responsibilities.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10748
Balkans Security Cooperation Act
SRES 939
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate that it values the active participation of the Republic of Kosovo as the state partner of the Iowa National Guard over the past 15 years.
HR 1744
United States Commission on International Religious Freedom Reauthorization Act of 2026
HCONRES 89
Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.