Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill restricts climate-related lawsuits against businesses and organizations.
The problem
Some believe climate-related legal claims are frivolous and harm businesses unfairly. Others say companies should face consequences for environmental damage.
The proposal
The bill would limit lawsuits related to climate change against companies and organizations. It may raise standards for proving harm from climate issues.
The impact
Businesses face fewer climate lawsuits. Environmental groups and affected communities may have reduced legal options. State governments' enforcement powers could change.
Companies would face fewer climate-related legal claims, reducing legal costs and uncertainty. Businesses could invest more in operations rather than litigation defense.
Supporters argue the bill prevents weak lawsuits that waste court time and resources. Courts could focus on more serious cases.
Fewer lawsuits create a more predictable business environment. Companies may invest more confidently in long-term projects.
Businesses causing environmental harm could face fewer legal consequences. Communities harmed by pollution may lose their day in court.
People harmed by climate impacts may be unable to sue for damages. This prevents victims from seeking compensation.
States may lose power to protect their residents through climate lawsuits. Federal limits on state authority raise federalism concerns.
If lawsuits are blocked, costs of climate damage fall to taxpayers instead of polluters. Insurance and government programs may pay for damages.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HRES 1606
Expressing support for the designation of the week of October 24, 2026, to October 31, 2026, as "Bat Week".
S 5640
Data Center Transparency Act of 2026
S 5604
Improving Species Recovery Act
S 5653
Bipartisan American Affordability and Jobs Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.