Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill to keep tax dollars in public schools instead of funding private school programs.
The problem
Some states use tax dollars to fund private school scholarships and education accounts. Supporters worry this reduces funding available for traditional public schools.
The proposal
Restrict how states can use federal tax dollars for private school vouchers, education savings accounts, or similar programs that direct public funds to private institutions.
The impact
Public school districts, private school families, and students may experience changes in school funding availability and education choices depending on their state.
Keeps more tax dollars available for public schools serving all students. This could increase resources for classrooms, teachers, and programs. Public schools serve roughly 90% of U.S. students.
Public schools must accept all students regardless of background or ability. Directing full funding to public schools guarantees education access for everyone without financial barriers.
Managing multiple education programs creates duplicate administrative systems. Consolidating funds in public schools could reduce overhead expenses and bureaucracy.
Public schools serve as community centers providing services beyond academics. Stronger public school funding supports broader community infrastructure and social programs.
Parents currently using private schools or education accounts would lose funding options. This reduces education flexibility for families seeking alternatives to public school systems.
Private schools relying on voucher programs could face enrollment and financial challenges. Some religious schools depend partly on these programs to serve families.
Simply increasing funding doesn't automatically improve school performance or student outcomes. Other factors like management and teaching quality matter significantly too.
Education is traditionally a state and local responsibility. This federal restriction limits state authority to design education policies that fit their communities.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10730
Healthy Communities Act of 2026
HR 5349
TAS Act
HR 9496
End Tax Penalties on American Hostages Act
HR 997
National Taxpayer Advocate Enhancement Act of 2025
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.