Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Prevents federal education funds from being used for private school vouchers or scholarships.
The problem
Some states use public education funding to support private school tuition through voucher programs, reducing money available for public schools.
The proposal
Restricts federal education dollars from being redirected to private school vouchers, tax credits, or scholarship accounts.
The impact
Public school students and districts, private school families, and state education budgets are affected by funding allocation rules.
Keeps federal money dedicated to public schools, potentially increasing resources for students in public institutions. This ensures voucher programs don't drain public school budgets.
Prevents wealthier families from accessing vouchers while public schools serve lower-income students. Keeps funding concentrated where most students attend.
Makes it clearer where federal dollars go and easier for Congress to track education spending. Reduces administrative complexity in tracking multiple funding streams.
Reduces parent ability to use public funds for alternative schools that match their child's needs. Families may be unable to afford private school tuition without federal help.
Without voucher options, more students stay in public schools, potentially creating capacity issues. Some districts may struggle to accommodate population increases.
Private schools receiving federal scholarship funding may see enrollment and revenue decline. Small independent schools could face financial challenges.
Prevents states from designing education programs matching local preferences and values. Federal mandate overrides state authority in education policy.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10730
Healthy Communities Act of 2026
HR 5349
TAS Act
HR 9496
End Tax Penalties on American Hostages Act
HR 997
National Taxpayer Advocate Enhancement Act of 2025
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.