Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Select Committee on Intelligence.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Gives intelligence community inspectors general the same pay and authority as other federal inspectors general.
The problem
Intelligence community inspectors general may have lower pay, authority, or resources than inspectors general in other federal agencies, creating potential disadvantages.
The proposal
The bill aligns pay, staffing, and authority standards for intelligence community inspectors general with those of inspectors general across other federal agencies.
The impact
Intelligence agency inspectors general, intelligence workers, and oversight of national security operations would be affected by improved standards and consistency.
Stronger, better-resourced inspectors general can more effectively catch fraud, waste, and misconduct in intelligence agencies. This improves accountability and protects taxpayer money.
Equal pay and authority make these positions more attractive to experienced professionals. This brings higher-quality oversight to sensitive national security work.
Intelligence community employees deserve the same level of independent oversight as workers in other federal agencies. This creates consistency across government.
Stronger independent inspectors general are better positioned to identify and report on potential abuses of power in classified programs.
Increasing pay and staffing for intelligence inspectors general costs taxpayer money. The bill does not specify funding amounts or offsets.
The bill title suggests parity but provides no summary. Actual changes, timelines, and costs remain unclear without seeing the full text.
It is unknown whether this applies to all intelligence agencies or specific ones, and how broad the authority changes would be.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 7683
VA Fiscal Management Modernization Act
HR 6698
Board of Veterans Appeals Annual Report Transparency Act of 2025
HR 7260
National Cemetery Administration Annual Report Act of 2026
HR 2283
Recognizing Community Organizations for Veteran Engagement and Recovery Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.