Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Prevents federal tax benefits for people convicted of participating in insurrections.
The problem
After January 6, 2021, questions arose about whether convicted insurrectionists should receive federal tax credits, deductions, or other financial benefits.
The proposal
Denies federal tax deductions, credits, and benefits to individuals convicted of insurrection or sedition crimes under federal law.
The impact
Convicted insurrectionists lose certain tax breaks. Affects IRS enforcement and federal tax code. May apply to small numbers of individuals.
Federal tax benefits paid by all taxpayers should not go to people convicted of trying to overthrow government. This ensures tax dollars don't support those who committed serious federal crimes.
Removing tax benefits adds consequences to insurrection convictions. This sends a clear signal that government will not benefit those convicted of seditious acts.
Most Americans follow tax laws. Denying benefits to convicted insurrectionists treats law-breakers differently than law-abiding citizens who pay taxes.
The Constitution limits post-conviction punishments. Some argue denying tax benefits years after conviction is an unusual additional penalty. Courts may question if this violates constitutional limits.
Very few people are convicted of federal insurrection crimes. The practical tax revenue impact is likely tiny compared to normal tax administration costs.
The IRS must track and verify insurrection convictions for all tax filers. This creates new administrative requirements and potential for errors or disputes.
The bill doesn't clarify whether it applies to past convictions or only future ones. Retroactive tax penalties raise fairness and legal questions.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10730
Healthy Communities Act of 2026
HR 5349
TAS Act
HR 9496
End Tax Penalties on American Hostages Act
HR 997
National Taxpayer Advocate Enhancement Act of 2025
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.