Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Agriculture.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Requires verification system for organic food imports into the United States.
The problem
The U.S. may import food labeled organic that doesn't meet American organic standards. This creates unfair competition for domestic organic farmers and consumer confusion about product authenticity.
The proposal
Establishes verification procedures to ensure imported organic products meet U.S. Department of Agriculture organic certification standards before entering American markets.
The impact
Organic farmers, food importers, retailers, and consumers are affected through stricter import rules, potential price changes, and product availability shifts.
American organic farmers face competition from cheaper imports with weaker standards. This bill levels the playing field by requiring all organic products to meet the same rules. Domestic farmers can compete fairly.
Consumers buying organic products expect consistent quality and certification standards. Verification ensures imported organic food meets the same requirements as domestic products. This builds consumer trust.
Different countries have different organic standards. This bill ensures all organic products sold in America follow U.S. rules. It creates a level playing field in the marketplace.
Stricter import verification adds costs that businesses pass to consumers. Imported organic food, which is often cheaper, may become more expensive. Families on tight budgets may pay more.
New verification procedures take time and resources to implement. This could delay organic imports, reducing product availability temporarily. Some products might become harder to find.
Other countries may see this as unfair trade practice and complain to trade organizations. This could damage U.S. relationships with trading partners. Other countries might create similar barriers for U.S. exports.
Small importers face high compliance costs for verification systems. Large companies can absorb these costs easier. This may push small importers out of business.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10157
Freedom to Home Distill Act
S 5301
Voice for Farm Workers Act
S 5303
Supporting Our Farm and Food System Workforce Act
HR 10058
Summer Meals and Learning Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.