Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Creates partnership to protect and manage the Connecticut River watershed region.
The problem
The Connecticut River watershed spans multiple states and needs coordinated management. Different agencies work separately instead of together on water protection.
The proposal
Establishes the Connecticut River Watershed Partnership to coordinate environmental management, conservation, and restoration efforts across state boundaries.
The impact
State agencies, environmental groups, communities, and businesses in the Connecticut River region gain coordinated resources for water quality and habitat protection.
A unified partnership can create stronger protections for the river and its water quality. Multiple states working together prevents gaps in environmental standards.
Coordinating efforts across states reduces duplicated work and saves taxpayer money. Shared resources are more efficient than separate state programs.
Fish and wildlife benefit from coordinated restoration efforts across the entire watershed. Connected habitats support healthier animal populations.
Local stakeholders and businesses can participate in watershed decisions. This builds support for environmental projects in the region.
The bill does not specify how much money the partnership receives or where it comes from. Taxpayers may worry about new federal spending.
Adding another coordinating agency may slow down decision-making. More layers of approval could delay environmental projects.
States may lose control over local environmental decisions to a partnership board. Conflicts could arise over who decides policy.
No official summary exists, making it difficult to assess specific powers or requirements. Uncertain provisions create implementation challenges.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HRES 1606
Expressing support for the designation of the week of October 24, 2026, to October 31, 2026, as "Bat Week".
S 5640
Data Center Transparency Act of 2026
S 5604
Improving Species Recovery Act
S 5653
Bipartisan American Affordability and Jobs Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.