Latest action: Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Establishes a partnership program to protect and manage the Connecticut River watershed.
The problem
The Connecticut River watershed spans multiple states and needs coordinated management. Different jurisdictions lack unified conservation strategies for this shared resource.
The proposal
Creates a Connecticut River Watershed Partnership to coordinate conservation, restoration, and management efforts among federal, state, and local governments.
The impact
Affects communities, states, and environmental organizations along the Connecticut River. Influences water quality, habitat protection, and regional land use planning decisions.
A unified partnership can coordinate efforts to protect water quality across state lines. This makes environmental protection more effective than each state working alone. Cleaner water benefits everyone who lives in or uses the river.
Coordinated management can restore fish habitats and wildlife areas more efficiently. A watershed-wide approach ensures restoration projects work together rather than competing.
A healthy watershed supports fishing, boating, and tourism industries. This partnership could create jobs in outdoor recreation and conservation sectors.
The partnership encourages states to work together on shared environmental challenges. This reduces conflicts and creates better solutions for everyone in the region.
Creating a new partnership agency requires funding for staff and administration. Taxpayers may need to fund another government program with unclear budget needs.
The bill details are limited, making it unclear how much power this partnership will have. Unclear decision-making authority could create confusion or bureaucratic delays.
States may disagree about how to manage shared water resources and land. A partnership requires compromise that some states might resist if it limits their independence.
With no official summary provided, voters and legislators cannot fully understand what this bill actually requires. This lack of transparency makes proper evaluation difficult.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HRES 1606
Expressing support for the designation of the week of October 24, 2026, to October 31, 2026, as "Bat Week".
S 5640
Data Center Transparency Act of 2026
S 5604
Improving Species Recovery Act
S 5653
Bipartisan American Affordability and Jobs Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.