Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Reduces judicial vacancies in District of Columbia courts by addressing staffing gaps.
The problem
DC courts likely have empty judge positions that slow cases and reduce court efficiency. These vacancies prevent timely justice.
The proposal
The bill creates a process to fill open judge positions in DC courts faster. It addresses how judicial vacancies are handled.
The impact
DC residents, court users, and judges are affected. Faster case processing and improved court operations could result from filled positions.
Filling judge vacancies helps courts handle cases quicker. People waiting for court decisions get results sooner. This improves access to justice.
More judges means courts can work at full capacity. This reduces case backlogs and court delays. Operations run more smoothly.
A functioning court system with adequate judges strengthens confidence in law and order. Citizens see justice happening without long waits.
Faster courts help businesses and individuals resolve disputes quickly. This supports economic activity and reduces uncertainty.
Hiring more judges requires government spending on salaries and benefits. This increases taxpayer costs without specific spending details provided.
The bill lacks clear information about implementation. Without specifics, it's unclear how effectively it will work or what it truly requires.
Judge selection can become politicized. The vacancy reduction process might face delays if appointment methods are controversial.
The bill addresses current vacancies but doesn't explain how to prevent future staffing gaps. Ongoing problems may recur.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10764
Executive Settlement Review Act
HR 8352
Criminal History Access Act of 2026
S 32
LACA
HR 10389
Survivor’s Voice Protection Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
No donor data found for current cycle
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.