Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Excludes small food security grants from taxable income.
The problem
Low-income individuals receiving food assistance grants may face tax liability, reducing the aid's effectiveness and creating financial hardship.
The proposal
Amends tax code to exclude micro-grants for food security from gross income, making these grants non-taxable to recipients.
The impact
Low-income and food-insecure individuals benefit from larger net assistance. Government loses some tax revenue. Charitable organizations distributing food aid are affected.
Food grants help more when recipients don't lose money to taxes. Families struggling with hunger keep the full benefit amount. This makes food assistance programs actually work better.
Food banks and charities can be more effective without tax complications. Organizations spend less time on paperwork and more time feeding people. Donors may be encouraged knowing benefits go directly to those in need.
Removes a confusing rule that taxes emergency food aid. Makes the tax system fairer for people in crisis. Aligns with the purpose of food assistance programs.
The government collects less tax money from this change. If many people receive these grants, revenue loss could be significant. Government must cut services or find other funding sources.
The bill must define what counts as a micro-grant and food security program. Unclear definitions could lead to confusion, disputes, and tax avoidance. Implementation and enforcement may be complicated and costly.
Only helps people receiving these specific grants. Does not address broader hunger or poverty issues. Other forms of assistance still face tax complications.
Unclear rules about what qualifies could allow misuse of the exclusion. Some might claim unrelated payments as food security grants. Tax system integrity could be compromised without careful limits.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10730
Healthy Communities Act of 2026
HR 5349
TAS Act
HR 9496
End Tax Penalties on American Hostages Act
HR 997
National Taxpayer Advocate Enhancement Act of 2025
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.