Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Establishes defense cooperation agreements between the U.S. and Abraham Accords signatory nations.
The problem
The Abraham Accords normalized relations between Israel and several Arab nations. The U.S. needs frameworks for military and security cooperation with these new partners.
The proposal
Creates defense cooperation mechanisms, military agreements, and security arrangements between the U.S. and Abraham Accords countries including UAE, Bahrain, Morocco, and Sudan.
The impact
Affects U.S. military policy, defense contractors, Middle Eastern nations, and security relationships. Impacts diplomatic ties and regional stability in the Middle East.
Defense cooperation with multiple Middle Eastern partners could enhance security in a volatile region. Coordinated military relationships may help counter shared threats like Iran's influence.
Defense agreements typically include arms sales and military equipment contracts. U.S. defense contractors could gain significant business opportunities in new markets.
Formalizing defense cooperation strengthens relationships beyond the Abraham Accords. Creates foundation for broader partnerships on intelligence, technology, and regional issues.
Coordinated defense partnerships can balance against hostile actors in the region. May improve collective response capabilities to shared security challenges.
Defense cooperation could obligate the U.S. to intervene in regional conflicts. May expand military presence and spending in the Middle East long-term.
Arab states normalizing with Israel without Palestinian resolution concerns human rights advocates. May be seen as abandoning Palestinian interests for strategic gains.
Increased military aid to some nations raises questions about governance and human rights records. Could fuel regional arms races and destabilize balances of power.
Close military ties with some Arab states might strain relationships with Iran-aligned nations. Could escalate regional tensions and proxy conflicts.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10748
Balkans Security Cooperation Act
SRES 939
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate that it values the active participation of the Republic of Kosovo as the state partner of the Iowa National Guard over the past 15 years.
HR 1744
United States Commission on International Religious Freedom Reauthorization Act of 2026
HCONRES 89
Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.