Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill addresses rules and opportunities for student-athletes in college sports.
The problem
Student-athletes face questions about eligibility, compensation, and name-image-likeness rights. Rules vary by school and state, creating confusion and unfair treatment.
The proposal
Bill likely modifies NCAA regulations, name-image-likeness policies, or athlete compensation rules. Specific changes require official bill text.
The impact
College athletes, universities, and sports programs affected. Changes could alter how students earn money and compete.
Student-athletes could earn money from endorsements and appearances. This rewards their work and popularity fairly, similar to professional athletes.
Uniform national standards prevent confusion between states and schools. Athletes know what's allowed everywhere they might compete.
Clear rules protect young athletes from exploitation. Standards ensure fair treatment across all colleges and sports.
Popular sports like football and basketball attract more sponsorship money. Less popular sports and athletes may fall further behind financially.
Universities may spend more on compliance and athlete services. These costs could raise tuition or reduce other programs.
If athletes earn significant money, they might prioritize sports over schooling. This could harm academic achievement and degree completion.
Smaller schools with fewer resources may struggle competing for athletes. Bigger, wealthier universities could dominate recruitment.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
S 4668
Protect College Sports Act of 2026
HR 9723
Fit Future Act
HRES 1487
Recognizing the 1960 University of Missouri Tigers Football Team for its undefeated regular season, Orange Bowl victory, and claim to the 1960 National Championship.
HRES 1482
Recognizing 100 years of American Legion Baseball and the American Legion World Series, and honoring the city of Shelby, North Carolina, for serving as the permanent home of the American Legion World Series.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.