Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Removes a 4% tax on investment income for certain religious organizations.
The problem
Religious institutions pay a 4% excise tax on net investment income. They argue this tax unfairly targets their organizations compared to secular nonprofits.
The proposal
Exempts qualified religious institutions from paying the 4% excise tax on investment income under the Internal Revenue Code.
The impact
Religious organizations would pay less in federal taxes. The government would collect less tax revenue from this source.
Religious institutions could use tax savings to fund charitable work, education, and community services. This allows them to allocate more resources to their missions.
Supporters argue religious organizations deserve the same tax treatment as other nonprofits. This could be seen as protecting religious freedom from tax burdens.
Lower taxes might enable religious institutions to invest more in community programs and charitable activities that serve vulnerable populations.
The federal government would collect less tax money, potentially requiring cuts to other programs or increases in other taxes.
Critics argue this creates a special tax break for religious organizations that secular nonprofits don't receive, violating principles of equal treatment.
Some argue government shouldn't give special tax benefits to religious groups, as this could blur the line between church and state.
The bill doesn't clearly define what counts as a 'qualified religious institution,' which could create disputes and unequal enforcement.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10730
Healthy Communities Act of 2026
HR 5349
TAS Act
HR 9496
End Tax Penalties on American Hostages Act
HR 997
National Taxpayer Advocate Enhancement Act of 2025
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.