Latest action: Referred to the Committee on Agriculture, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Proposes preventing or restricting paraquat pesticide use in the United States.
The problem
Paraquat is a herbicide linked to health concerns. Some countries have banned it due to potential risks to farmworkers and environmental issues.
The proposal
The bill would likely restrict or prohibit paraquat pesticide sales and use in American agriculture, similar to bans in other nations.
The impact
Farmers would need alternative herbicides. Agricultural workers and rural communities would see changes in pest management practices and costs.
Paraquat exposure has been linked to health problems in agricultural workers. Restricting it could reduce workplace injuries and illnesses in farming communities.
Limiting paraquat use could reduce chemical runoff into waterways and soil contamination. This protects ecosystems and water quality.
Many developed nations have already banned paraquat. US action would match international safety standards and simplify trade agreements.
Reducing pesticide-related illnesses could lower healthcare expenses and worker compensation claims over time.
Alternative herbicides may be more expensive than paraquat. Farmers could face higher production costs, potentially raising food prices.
Paraquat is effective and fast-acting. Alternative herbicides might be less effective or require more applications, reducing farm productivity.
Chemical manufacturers and distributors could lose paraquat-related jobs. Rural economies dependent on pesticide manufacturing may be negatively affected.
If other countries continue using paraquat-treated imports, US farmers lose a competitive advantage without corresponding global restrictions.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HRES 1606
Expressing support for the designation of the week of October 24, 2026, to October 31, 2026, as "Bat Week".
S 5640
Data Center Transparency Act of 2026
S 5604
Improving Species Recovery Act
S 5653
Bipartisan American Affordability and Jobs Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.