Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill aims to limit frivolous lawsuits and their costs on businesses and individuals.
The problem
Excessive lawsuits sometimes lack merit but still cost defendants significant money defending themselves, potentially harming innovation and economic growth.
The proposal
The bill would establish stricter rules for filing lawsuits, require early case evaluation, and impose penalties on parties filing baseless claims.
The impact
Businesses, individuals, lawyers, and courts would face new procedures and standards for lawsuits, potentially reducing litigation volume and costs.
Businesses and individuals spend less money defending against weak lawsuits. This could free up resources for other purposes like hiring or investment.
Filtering out baseless cases earlier allows courts to focus on serious cases. This could reduce wait times for legitimate lawsuits.
Companies may take more risks and innovate if they worry less about frivolous lawsuits. This could boost economic growth.
Small companies often lack resources to fight expensive lawsuits even when they have merit. This bill could help them avoid unfair costs.
Stricter rules might prevent people with real injuries from suing. Victims could struggle to get justice and compensation they deserve.
Large corporations can better handle new legal requirements and afford expensive lawyers. Small businesses and individuals may be hurt more.
Fewer lawsuits could mean wrongdoers face less consequence for harm they cause. Dangerous products or negligent companies might face less oversight.
Lawsuits are a key way people hold corporations accountable for unsafe products. Limiting them could reduce safety standards.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10764
Executive Settlement Review Act
HR 8352
Criminal History Access Act of 2026
S 32
LACA
HR 10389
Survivor’s Voice Protection Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.