Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill to improve access to juice products in schools and food assistance programs.
The problem
Some communities lack affordable juice access. Schools may have limited juice options. Low-income families struggle to buy nutritious drinks.
The proposal
Bill would expand juice availability in schools and food assistance programs. May increase funding or requirements for juice distribution.
The impact
Students, low-income families, schools, and juice producers could be affected. Changes to what drinks are available and how programs work.
Students and low-income families could get healthier drinks. Juice provides vitamins and natural sugars. This supports better nutrition for children.
Increased juice demand helps farmers and juice companies. More sales for producers means more jobs. Rural economies could benefit.
Juice options make school meals more appealing. Students may eat healthier when better drinks are available.
Food assistance programs could include more juice. Families with less money get better nutrition options.
Expanding juice programs costs tax money. Schools and government may need more funding. This could strain already tight budgets.
Juice has natural sugars that can add calories. Too much juice may contribute to obesity and tooth decay. Health experts sometimes recommend limiting juice.
Without a bill summary, specific rules are unknown. Schools may not know what to do. Rules could be confusing or hard to follow.
More juice means more packaging waste. Schools need space to store juice. Expired juice may go to waste.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10157
Freedom to Home Distill Act
S 5301
Voice for Farm Workers Act
S 5303
Supporting Our Farm and Food System Workforce Act
HR 10058
Summer Meals and Learning Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.