Latest action: Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Intelligence (Permanent Select), for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Extends government surveillance powers under FISA through April 2029.
The problem
Title VII surveillance authorities expire and need renewal to maintain foreign intelligence collection capabilities.
The proposal
Extends FISA Amendments Act Title VII authorities through April 20, 2029, allowing continued surveillance operations.
The impact
Affects intelligence agencies, foreign nationals communicating with Americans, and privacy advocates concerned about surveillance scope.
Allows intelligence agencies to continue monitoring foreign threats without interruption. Prevents gaps in national security surveillance that could compromise counterterrorism and counterintelligence efforts.
Extends authority through 2029, giving agencies long-term planning stability. Avoids repeated congressional reauthorization processes that could create dangerous lapses.
Enables monitoring of foreign intelligence activities targeting the United States. Helps protect national security by tracking hostile nation-states and terrorist organizations.
Extends powers that allow surveillance of Americans communicating with foreigners. Civil liberties groups argue this can capture innocent communications without adequate oversight.
Extension occurs without clear evidence of improved oversight or judicial review. Previous reauthorizations have shown limited transparency in how these powers are actually used.
Three-year extension is lengthy without regular congressional review of effectiveness. Makes it harder to change policies if abuses emerge or circumstances change.
Complex surveillance authority renewed without significant public debate or disclosure. Citizens cannot fully understand scope of programs they're affected by.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 7683
VA Fiscal Management Modernization Act
HR 6698
Board of Veterans Appeals Annual Report Transparency Act of 2025
HR 7260
National Cemetery Administration Annual Report Act of 2026
HR 2283
Recognizing Community Organizations for Veteran Engagement and Recovery Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.