Latest action: Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committees on Intelligence (Permanent Select), and Financial Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Extends government powers to monitor foreign communications under FISA law.
The problem
Title VII of FISA authorities are set to expire. Congress must decide whether to renew these foreign surveillance powers used by intelligence agencies.
The proposal
Extends authorities in Title VII of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978, allowing continued surveillance programs targeting foreign intelligence operations.
The impact
Intelligence agencies can continue monitoring foreign communications. Americans' privacy protections and foreign nationals' rights are affected by surveillance scope decisions.
Extending these authorities allows intelligence agencies to detect and prevent terrorist threats and foreign espionage. Continuity in surveillance capabilities helps protect U.S. interests abroad.
Extending existing authorities avoids gaps in intelligence gathering that could occur if programs lapsed. Maintains relationships with foreign intelligence partners who rely on these authorities.
Explicit extension provides clear legal authority for intelligence operations. Reduces uncertainty about which surveillance activities are lawful.
Congress can debate and modify authorities before reauthorization. Allows lawmakers to adjust surveillance powers based on current threats.
Broad surveillance authorities can incidentally collect communications from Americans and innocent foreign citizens. Limited transparency about actual surveillance scope and methods.
No official summary available makes it difficult for public to understand what powers are being extended. Citizens cannot effectively advocate for or against specific authorities.
Extending existing authorities can become routine without serious examination of effectiveness or necessity. Surveillance powers historically expand rather than contract when renewed.
Broad surveillance authorities may discourage legitimate political organizing and journalism targeting government actions. Foreign activists and dissidents may avoid working with U.S.-based organizations.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 7683
VA Fiscal Management Modernization Act
HR 6698
Board of Veterans Appeals Annual Report Transparency Act of 2025
HR 7260
National Cemetery Administration Annual Report Act of 2026
HR 2283
Recognizing Community Organizations for Veteran Engagement and Recovery Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.