Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Improves cybersecurity protections for farm technology and agricultural equipment systems.
The problem
Modern farms use connected computers and machines. Hackers could attack these systems, damaging crops, equipment, and farm operations. Current protections are unclear or weak.
The proposal
Creates cybersecurity standards and rules for agricultural technology. Helps farmers protect their computer systems. May require companies to report security problems.
The impact
Farmers, agricultural technology companies, and rural communities gain better protection against cyberattacks on farming equipment and data systems.
Strong cybersecurity standards prevent hackers from attacking farming equipment and systems. This keeps farms running smoothly and protects crops and livestock from technology failures.
Farmers' data about crops, yields, and land is valuable. Better security stops companies or criminals from stealing this private information.
Protecting farms from cyberattacks helps rural communities stay economically strong. Farmers can trust technology investments and focus on growing food.
Clear security standards help companies design safer agricultural technology. This creates good practices across the entire farm technology industry.
Meeting new cybersecurity requirements costs money for equipment, software, and training. Small farms with tight budgets may struggle to afford these expenses.
New rules require farms to follow complicated procedures and keep records. This creates extra work for farmers who already have many responsibilities.
Without details, it's uncertain how strictly rules will be enforced or what specific technology must be used. This uncertainty makes planning difficult.
Security requirements might force farms to use only approved equipment or older proven technology. This could slow down access to new and better farming innovations.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10157
Freedom to Home Distill Act
S 5301
Voice for Farm Workers Act
S 5303
Supporting Our Farm and Food System Workforce Act
HR 10058
Summer Meals and Learning Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.