Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Protects companies from lawsuits related to stone slab products they sell.
The problem
Stone slab product manufacturers and sellers may face legal liability for injuries or damages allegedly caused by their products, creating potential business and financial risks.
The proposal
The bill would provide legal protections limiting lawsuits against businesses that lawfully manufacture, distribute, or sell stone slab products.
The impact
Stone slab industry businesses would face fewer lawsuits. Consumers with injuries might have reduced legal recourse against manufacturers and sellers.
Companies selling stone slabs would spend less money on litigation and legal defense. This could lower prices for consumers and encourage business growth in the stone slab industry.
Businesses following proper manufacturing and safety rules would not face excessive lawsuits. This shields responsible companies from unfair legal claims.
Lower legal risk could attract investment and business expansion in the stone slab market. This may create jobs in manufacturing and sales.
The law could stop weak legal claims against businesses. This saves court time and resources for more serious cases.
People injured by defective or unsafe stone slabs might not be able to sue manufacturers. This limits remedies for consumers harmed by dangerous products.
Companies could face fewer consequences for selling unsafe stone slabs. This removes pressure on businesses to maintain safety standards.
People who suffer injuries from stone slab products would have fewer legal options to recover medical costs or damages. This unfairly burdens injured individuals.
The bill's exact protections are unclear without seeing full language. This creates uncertainty about which lawsuits would actually be blocked.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10764
Executive Settlement Review Act
HR 8352
Criminal History Access Act of 2026
S 32
LACA
HR 10389
Survivor’s Voice Protection Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.