Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Establishes the Esther Coopersmith Award to recognize contributions to international affairs.
The problem
No official summary available. Bill appears to honor Esther Coopersmith's work in international diplomacy and relations.
The proposal
Creates an award named after Esther Coopersmith to recognize individuals for achievements in international affairs and diplomacy.
The impact
Recognizes diplomatic service and may influence international relations priorities through highlighting specific contributions to global affairs.
Recognizes individuals who contribute to international relations and diplomacy. Creates a visible award for important global work. May inspire others to pursue international service.
Establishing an award requires minimal government spending. Does not create new agencies or programs. Administrative cost is likely very small.
Honoring individual achievement in diplomacy typically has broad support. Does not advance partisan policy positions. Focuses on recognizing merit and service.
Creating an award does not address underlying international policy issues. Symbolic recognition may not change outcomes in foreign relations. No new resources directed to actual diplomatic work.
Bill details are unavailable, so it's unclear who decides award winners. No public information on selection standards or process. Potential for questions about fairness or politics.
Awards for achievements can often be created through executive action or private organizations. Spending legislative time on this may delay other priorities. Could be handled outside the formal legislative process.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10748
Balkans Security Cooperation Act
SRES 939
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate that it values the active participation of the Republic of Kosovo as the state partner of the Iowa National Guard over the past 15 years.
HR 1744
United States Commission on International Religious Freedom Reauthorization Act of 2026
HCONRES 89
Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.