Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Requires annual assessments of AI terrorism threats to the U.S.
The problem
Generative AI technology could be misused for terrorist activities. The government needs current information about these emerging threats.
The proposal
The Secretary of Homeland Security must complete yearly reports assessing how terrorists might use AI to harm Americans.
The impact
Homeland Security officials and Congress get better threat information. Security agencies can plan defenses. The public may learn limited details about AI risks.
Annual assessments help identify new threats before they happen. This gives agencies time to prepare defenses and protect Americans.
Congress gets regular expert reports on AI threats. This helps lawmakers create better laws to protect the country.
Required annual reports ensure the government regularly reviews this issue. Congress can monitor progress and demand action if needed.
These assessments can help different government agencies share information and work together against AI-based threats.
Creating annual assessments requires hiring experts and spending money. This adds to government budgets that are already stretched thin.
Reports about AI threats could leak to the public or bad actors. This might give terrorists ideas or help them avoid detection.
The bill does not clearly define what assessments must include. Agencies might produce reports that are too broad or incomplete.
The bill only addresses threats from terrorists. It does not cover other dangerous uses of AI by criminals or hostile nations.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 7683
VA Fiscal Management Modernization Act
HR 6698
Board of Veterans Appeals Annual Report Transparency Act of 2025
HR 7260
National Cemetery Administration Annual Report Act of 2026
HR 2283
Recognizing Community Organizations for Veteran Engagement and Recovery Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.