Latest action: Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 517.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Sponsor
Pete Ricketts (R-NE)
Filed in the Senate.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Bill modifies defense article export rules under the AUKUS military partnership.
The problem
Current Arms Export Control Act limits how the US can share defense technology with AUKUS allies Australia and UK under certain conditions.
The proposal
Changes restrictions on exporting and transferring military equipment and services to AUKUS partner nations through modifications to Arms Export Control Act.
The impact
Affects US military relationships with Australia and UK, defense contractors, and national security decision-making around technology sharing.
Easier defense technology sharing with trusted allies Australia and UK could improve military coordination and interoperability. This may enhance regional security in Indo-Pacific and European areas.
Fewer export restrictions could increase sales opportunities for US defense contractors. This may create jobs and economic growth in the defense sector.
Streamlining export controls could speed up technology transfers to close partners. This allows faster response to regional security challenges.
Shared defense systems and technology improve how allied militaries work together. Better coordination strengthens collective defense capabilities.
Loosening export controls could increase risk of sensitive technology being compromised or leaked. Defense secrets might be exposed to foreign adversaries through allies.
Fewer restrictions may reduce congressional and public oversight of defense exports. It becomes harder to track what technology is being shared and with whom.
Shared technology might eventually reach unauthorized countries or non-state actors. Controlling advanced weapons technology becomes more difficult.
Other nations may demand similar relaxed export rules, undermining US control of sensitive technology. This could weaken America's strategic advantages.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10748
Balkans Security Cooperation Act
SRES 939
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate that it values the active participation of the Republic of Kosovo as the state partner of the Iowa National Guard over the past 15 years.
HR 1744
United States Commission on International Religious Freedom Reauthorization Act of 2026
HCONRES 89
Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
No donor data found for current cycle
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.