Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Select Committee on Intelligence.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Reforms foreign intelligence surveillance and prohibits targeting U.S. persons improperly.
The problem
Current foreign intelligence surveillance authorities may allow improper monitoring of Americans. Reverse targeting could gather intelligence on U.S. citizens under the guise of foreign surveillance.
The proposal
The bill modifies foreign surveillance powers and explicitly prohibits reverse targeting. It adds safeguards to prevent U.S. persons from being monitored through foreign intelligence operations.
The impact
Intelligence agencies must follow stricter rules. Americans gain privacy protections. Foreign surveillance operations face new limitations and oversight requirements.
The bill prevents spying on U.S. citizens by closing loopholes in surveillance law. Americans cannot be secretly monitored just because intelligence agencies claim they are foreign targets. This strengthens constitutional protections.
Adding clear rules about what surveillance is allowed makes the system more transparent. Congress and the public can better understand how intelligence agencies operate. This helps prevent secret abuses.
The bill makes laws clearer about reverse targeting, which was a legal gray area. Intelligence agencies get specific guidance on what they can and cannot do. This reduces confusion and unintended violations.
Explicit prohibitions on reverse targeting give courts and Congress better tools to catch violations. Stronger rules make it easier to hold agencies accountable. This improves the check on government power.
Stricter rules may make it harder for intelligence agencies to gather foreign intelligence. Agents might have to stop monitoring in cases where American involvement is unclear. This could weaken national security capabilities.
New prohibitions could make existing surveillance operations invalid or force them to stop. Agencies might struggle to figure out which current programs comply with the new rules. This creates confusion during the transition.
The bill details are not yet public, so it is unclear how strict the rules really are. Agencies might interpret the new rules differently than Congress intended. This could lead to future disputes over what the law actually requires.
Intelligence agencies may need to hire lawyers and compliance staff to follow new rules. Training programs might be needed to teach agents the new procedures. These costs add up and use budget for other security needs.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 7683
VA Fiscal Management Modernization Act
HR 6698
Board of Veterans Appeals Annual Report Transparency Act of 2025
HR 7260
National Cemetery Administration Annual Report Act of 2026
HR 2283
Recognizing Community Organizations for Veteran Engagement and Recovery Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.