Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Requires federal agencies to track and report how taxpayer money is spent.
The problem
Citizens struggle to understand where federal tax dollars go. Government spending lacks transparent tracking and public accountability mechanisms.
The proposal
The bill creates systems for federal agencies to document and publicly report detailed information about tax spending and budget usage.
The impact
Taxpayers gain visibility into federal spending. Agencies must implement new tracking systems. Government transparency and public oversight increase.
Citizens can see where their tax money goes. This helps people understand federal priorities and hold government accountable. Better public information supports informed voting decisions.
Public tracking systems discourage misuse of funds. Agencies knowing spending is visible work harder to prevent errors. Accountability measures catch problems earlier.
Detailed spending data helps lawmakers make smarter budget choices. Congress can identify effective programs and eliminate wasteful ones. Better information supports evidence-based policy.
Agencies need new software, staff, and systems to track everything. These startup and ongoing costs use taxpayer money. Small agencies might struggle with expenses.
Detailed spending information could expose sensitive security or personnel details. Finding the balance between transparency and privacy is difficult. Some information might need to stay confidential.
Agencies spend time reporting instead of delivering services. Staff must manage new systems and documentation requirements. Smaller offices face bigger proportional challenges.
Massive spending reports may confuse average citizens rather than inform them. Too much detailed data can overwhelm people. Public understanding might not actually improve.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10730
Healthy Communities Act of 2026
HR 5349
TAS Act
HR 9496
End Tax Penalties on American Hostages Act
HR 997
National Taxpayer Advocate Enhancement Act of 2025
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.