Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill addressing potential conflicts of interest in armed forces leadership and procurement.
The problem
Concerns about officials serving multiple roles or having financial interests that could create conflicts in military decision-making and spending.
The proposal
Establishes restrictions on dual positions and financial interests for Department of Defense personnel in specific roles and procurement processes.
The impact
Affects military leadership, contractors, and procurement officials. May limit career paths but aims to increase trust in defense spending decisions.
Prevents officials from making decisions that benefit their personal finances or multiple employers. Creates clearer rules about who can decide on military contracts. Increases public trust in how defense money is spent.
Ensures military decisions are based on national interest, not personal profit. Prevents divided loyalties that could compromise defense choices. Strengthens integrity of procurement process.
Makes it clearer who is responsible for decisions. Reduces hidden financial incentives affecting policy. Easier for Congress and public to track potential problems.
Experienced professionals with multiple roles may be excluded from positions. Could reduce access to industry expertise in military planning. May result in less experienced personnel in critical roles.
Pentagon must create new systems to track and enforce restrictions. Requires additional oversight staff and monitoring. Government spending may increase for compliance infrastructure.
Bill title suggests scope but details unavailable. Terms like 'double dealing' may be interpreted differently. Potential legal challenges over what counts as a conflict.
Defense contractors may lose access to military advisors with private sector experience. Could reduce innovation transfer between private and public sectors. May affect recruitment of talented individuals.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 7683
VA Fiscal Management Modernization Act
HR 6698
Board of Veterans Appeals Annual Report Transparency Act of 2025
HR 7260
National Cemetery Administration Annual Report Act of 2026
HR 2283
Recognizing Community Organizations for Veteran Engagement and Recovery Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.