Latest action: Referred to the Subcommittee on Nutrition and Foreign Agriculture.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill would exclude cost-of-living adjustments from certain agricultural benefit calculations.
The problem
Current rules count COLAs when determining eligibility or benefit amounts for agricultural programs. This may affect how federal farm assistance is distributed or calculated.
The proposal
The bill changes how cost-of-living adjustments are treated in agriculture and food programs. It would exclude COLAs from certain benefit calculations or eligibility determinations.
The impact
Farmers, agricultural workers, and food assistance recipients could face changed benefit levels or eligibility. The specific impact depends on which programs are affected by this change.
Excluding COLAs from calculations could reduce federal spending on agricultural programs. This might free up resources for other priorities or reduce overall government spending.
Removing COLA adjustments could make programs easier to calculate and administer. This could reduce paperwork and processing time for farmers and program staff.
Predictable benefit amounts without COLA fluctuations could help farmers plan budgets more consistently. It removes uncertainty caused by annual adjustment changes.
Without COLA adjustments, agricultural benefits lose value as inflation rises over time. Farmers and food assistance recipients would effectively receive less in real dollars each year.
Small and struggling farmers rely on stable assistance during economic downturns. Excluding COLAs could push vulnerable agricultural workers deeper into financial hardship.
Reduced agricultural benefits could decrease food production and affect food availability. This might impact consumer food prices and national food security.
Benefits that don't keep pace with inflation disproportionately hurt lower-income agricultural workers. This could widen the gap between wealthy and struggling farmers.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10157
Freedom to Home Distill Act
S 5301
Voice for Farm Workers Act
S 5303
Supporting Our Farm and Food System Workforce Act
HR 10058
Summer Meals and Learning Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.