Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill provides tax incentives for real estate development near public transportation.
The problem
Urban areas lack affordable housing near transit. Sprawl increases car dependence and pollution. Development costs near transit stations remain high.
The proposal
Creates tax credits and deductions for developers building homes and businesses near public transportation hubs to encourage compact, walkable communities.
The impact
Affects developers, homebuyers, cities, and transit systems. May increase housing options near transit but requires federal tax revenue allocation.
Tax incentives could lower development costs, making homes cheaper near transit. People wouldn't need cars, saving money on gas and maintenance. Communities become more walkable.
Reduces car use and pollution when people live near buses and trains. Decreases greenhouse gases. Protects open space from sprawl.
Businesses thrive in walkable neighborhoods with foot traffic. More jobs and tax revenue for cities. Increases property values near transit.
Fewer cars on roads when transit is accessible. Shorter commutes. Better air quality in urban areas.
Tax credits cost the government money. Other programs may need cuts. Increases national deficit unless offset elsewhere.
Developers might build expensive units instead of affordable ones. Wealthier people benefit more. Could increase gentrification and displacement.
Rural and suburban communities lack transit to benefit from incentives. Creates inequality between regions. Some cities need infrastructure first.
No official summary provided. Rules about tax credits unclear. Difficult to predict actual results without details.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10730
Healthy Communities Act of 2026
HR 5349
TAS Act
HR 9496
End Tax Penalties on American Hostages Act
HR 997
National Taxpayer Advocate Enhancement Act of 2025
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
No donor data found for current cycle
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.